Support answers that cite a real source, not a guess.
The risk with AI-assisted support is confident invention. We build RAG assistants grounded in your own documentation and ticket history, using Spring AI's QuestionAnswerAdvisor pattern against your own vector store, so every answer traces back to a real source your team can verify.
What this looks like in practice
Retrieval grounded in your own documentation, tickets and knowledge base — not the model's general training data — using Spring AI's QuestionAnswerAdvisor pattern against your own vector store.
Every answer traces back to a real source your team can verify, instead of a confident-sounding invention.
Built inside the Spring Boot systems you already run, so the assistant has access to real ticket and account context, not just static documents.
Evaluation against a fixed test set of real support questions before release, so accuracy is measured, not assumed.
Guardrails and escalation paths for questions the assistant shouldn't answer alone — it's a force multiplier for your support team, not a replacement for judgment.
The same grounded-RAG pattern, in production
The retrieval and grounding pattern here is the one behind OptaAI, our AI-native sourcing platform — Spring AI, OpenAI embeddings and Elasticsearch vector search, with citations grounded in real data. Read the case study →
Support & knowledge AI — frequently asked questions
How do you stop the assistant from making things up?
Can this integrate with our existing ticketing system?
Is this the same technology as the OptaAI sourcing platform?
Talk to an architect about your support or knowledge tooling.
Tell us what your team keeps looking up manually — we'll map what's worth grounding first.